Wednesday, April 23, 2008

Microsoft finishes big XP update

Microsoft said on Monday that it has wrapped up development of its long-awaited Service Pack 3 update to Windows XP.

The update, which consists of previously released updates and a few new bug fixes and changes, will be available for download via the Web on April 29. Microsoft said it plans to start pushing out XP SP3 this summer to "home users" who have Automatic Updates turned on.

A Microsoft representative said the company won't update boxed copies of Windows XP with the service pack, though it will be an option for computer makers that are still offering XP on new machines. Large computer makers have only until June to sell XP on standard systems, though some low-cost, low-memory machines can be sold with XP until 2010, as can some PCs aimed at emerging markets.

Microsoft has been testing Windows XP Service Pack 3 for some time. The product was planned to be released as early as 2006, but was pushed back several times as Microsoft focused on developing and updating Windows Vista.

Colleague Robert Vamosi will have a hands-on look shortly and I'll post a link here.

Form : http://www.news.com/

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

Apple to Acquire Chipmaker P.A. Semi for $278 Million

Forbes reports
that Apple has agreed to purchase chip manufacturer P.A. Semi for $278
million. The company, founded in 2003, focuses on sophisticated,
low-power chips that could possibly used in future models of the iPhone.

The
decision to center the iPhone design around a chip that Apple could own
marks a significant strategic choice by Apple Chief Executive Steve
Jobs, and is aimed at ensuring Apple can continue to differentiate its
flagship phone as a raft of competitors flood the market. According to
a source affiliated with the chip company, Jobs and Senior Vice
President Tony Fadell led the tiny group of executives who spearheaded
the acquisition, which included negotiations that took place in Jobs'
home.

P.A. Semi and Apple are no strangers to each other, as the chipmaker was reportedly courted by Apple to possibly provide Power-based chips before Apple finally settled on the switch to Intel.



Recent rumors have suggested that future platforms based around Intel's forthcoming Atom processor might be targeted for the iPhone, but Apple's acquisition of P.A. Semi suggests that this may not be the case.

Form : http://www.macrumors.com/

Apple Buys Microprocessor Chip Firm; Possible Use With iPhone and iPods

Apple has finally done something with its cash, although spending a tiny part of it, after much speculation of what it would do: it has bought a boutique microprocessor design company called PA Semi. The price, not disclosed, but the story says around $278 million in cash.

PA Semi, which is known for its design of sophisticated, low-power chips, could spell a new future for Apple's flagship iPhone, and possibly iPod products as well, according to this Forbes story. The 150-person chip company was founded in 2003. Apple is slated to announced its Q108 earnings tomorrow.

On this, Apple's choice is a blow for Intel , which has been trying to convince Apple to rely on Intel's chips, including its latest low-power line up, called Atom, which was supposed to be used for handheld devices.

Form : http://www.washingtonpost.com/

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Free Rescue Kit for Mac OS X - Lite restores Mac

Paragon Software Group (PSG) on Tuesday announced the Rescue Kit for Mac OS X - Lite, a new software application that helps users recover from system problems. It’s free and available now, and it’s the “lite” version of a product that will be released in the third calendar quarter of 2008. PSG is offering this as part of a public beta test.

The Rescue Kit for Mac OS X - Lite restores your Mac back to its state prior to a catastrophic system failure. It works by performing a sector-level backup, which PSG claims works faster than typical utilities also available. Also included is a File Transfer Wizard which helps you get access to any file system, even those not supported by the OS.

The Rescue Kit for Mac OS X - Lite lets you perform a full backup and restore even if the operating system can’t be loaded, features a built-in “image browser” that lets you find and restore individual files, and lets you backup and restore from any accessible network. It supports commonly used file systems including FAT 16 and 32, NTFS, HPFS, EXT2FS, EXT3FS, Reiser and Apple HFS and HFS+.

System requirements call for Mac OS X v10.4 or later.

Form : http://www.macworld.com/

Technorati Tags: , ,

From Win32 to Cocoa: a Windows User's Conversion to Mac OS X

Ars' Peter Bright wrote an article today entitled "From Win32 to Cocoa: a Windows user's conversion to Mac OS X", in which he explains why he believes "Windows is dying, Windows applications suck, and Microsoft is too blinkered to fix any of it". These are rather harsh words, but there is a definitive element of truth in it. The article is part one in a three-part series.

In
the article, Bright first explains how Microsoft developers were in a
happy place in the latter half of the 1990's, whereas Apple was in big
trouble due to the fact that its operating system was an old piece of
junk (personally, I happen to like Mac OS 9, apart from its slowness).
On Microsoft, Bright writes:


I felt well-treated by Microsoft. MSDN Library
was an invaluable developer resource; Microsoft was open about what it
were doing, giving out betas of Windows XP (or Whistler, as it then
was) to all and sundry, and it felt like they knew what they were
doing. The company had a roadmap of Whistler and Blackcomb; it had a
plan.

This was attractive to someone who programmed for a living.
Developers felt valued, like the company cared about them. I enjoy
programming, and I enjoy writing software. I did then; I do now. So for
me, this is really a key piece of what a platform has to offer.



The Apple world wasn't as rosy as the Microsoft world back then.
Apple's operating system lacked a lot of modern technologies like
protected memory and preemptive multitasking. Apple started the Copland project to bolt these (and other) technologies onto what is now known as Classic, but they failed miserably.
Promised developer releases were never released, it suffered from
feature creep, and was ultimately cancelled. Consequently, Apple went
shopping for another operating system to base the next generation Apple
OS on, and after a brief flirt with Be, Inc., they purchased Steve
Jobs' NeXT Software and its operating system, NeXTstep. The rest is
history. As Bright writes:


This approach - forced on it due to screwing up
the Copland project - put Apple in a strong position. The new OS was
free of many of the legacy constraints that the Copland approach would
have caused; the clumsy old APIs were restricted to the Classic
environment, and they didn't form a part of the modern OS core.
Although the new APIs were not entirely new - the Obj-C Cocoa API was
based on the NeXTstep API, and Carbon was similar to the old MacOS API
- they were cleaned up, allowing bad decisions of the past to be fixed.


It took a while before Mac OS X, released in 2001, became usable, but
Apple continued to update the operating system, adding new frameworks
and APIs, which enabled developers to easily make applications that not
only looked great, but worked great too. Microsoft, in the meantime,
had released Windows XP, and more or less left it unchanged for years
until Windows Vista came along last year.

Bright continues to explain that these high quality frameworks
and APIs in Mac OS X resulted in Mac applications that looked and
worked great. This was not only a result of the APIs, Bright argues,
but also because of the attitude of the developers using them; Mac
developers seem more devoted, more willing to make an effort with their
applications. Compare this to the bulk of Windows applications, which
are "shoddy", as if Windows developers "just don't care". Bright
attributes this to the fact that many Windows programmers work for the
enterprise. Summing up, he states:


So Mac OS X was going from strength to
strength, and its third-party software ecosystem was flourishing.
Developers for Mac OS X were conscientious and passionate about what
they were doing, and it showed. Back at Redmond? Inactivity. Oh, they
were busy working on Vista, churning out lots of code that didn't work,
scrapping it, and starting over. Talking up major (if dubious) new
features and then killing them off. And you know, Vista's okay. It's
not bad. There are bits of it I really like.

But it doesn't inspire me. Writing software for Windows is a pain.
Much of the platform is clunky and badly put together, and it makes
development much less enjoyable than it should be.



And that is the main argument Bright puts forth in his article. The
Win32 API still suffers from design decisions made over 20 years ago,
and it's huge, and, according to Bright at least, quite inconsistent. "It's inconsistent in every way imaginable."


Back in July 2007, I wrote something similar in an article
in which I detailed how I think Microsoft should go about the
development of Windows Vista's successor, Windows 7. One of my main
points was that the NT kernel doesn't really need to be scrapped; it is
the userland and APIs that need to be rebuilt from the ground-up, with
backwards compatibility moved into a virtual machine, just like Apple
did in Mac OS X with the Classic environment for old System 8/9
applications. Today's processors are fast enough for such a VM.

In addition, my article advised Microsoft to release betas and
RCs often, free for the public to test and play with. After the release
of this imaginary Windows 7, Microsoft should mimic Apple's behaviour
after the release of Mac OS X 10.0: update the operating system as
often as possible, preferably free of charge. Provide excellent
documentation on the new APIs, allow easy access to bug-tracking
systems, and create a good atmosphere for developers and users to
interact with one another.

It is still too early to tell whether Microsoft will take such
a bold step, but it seems as if I am not the only one advocating it.
Which is a comfort.

Form : http://www.osnews.com/

Nokia Adds Sony BMG to 'Comes With Music' Mobile Line-up

Sony BMG said Tuesday it will offer content when Nokia launches its Comes With Music program in the second half of 2008.

Nokia Comes With Music was announced in last December, and packages a mobile phone with a year of unlimited access to music.

Sony BMG is the second record label to jump on board after Universal Music Group. Its roster includes artists such as Alicia Keys, Britney Spears and Bruce Springsteen. Nokia has said it expects all major labels to join.

The Finnish phone giant has said it hopes the service will add new revenue for the benefit of artists, labels and other rights holders.

Several questions remain, however. Nokia still hasn't announced where the service will launch, and on which phones.

Nokia recently denied reports that it will pay Universal Music Group US$35 for every phone that offers the service. The actual sum is still being negotiated, according to a spokeswoman.

Form : http://www.pcworld.com/

Technorati Tags: ,

Microsoft Targets Low-Cost PC Market

Microsoft sees the ultra-low cost PC market as a significant opportunity and plans to pursue it with vigor, according the Kevin Turner, Microsoft's chief operating officer.

The market for ultra-low cost PCs (ULCPC) also is drawing heavy interest from vendors using the Linux operating system that are manufacturing computers and devices based on the open source operating system.

"We see this as a serious space and we are gong to fully participate in ULCPC," Turner says. "We are spending a fair amount of time on it."

Turner says it isn't all about emerging markets, however, which is where the focus is now. "This may start in emerging markets, but it is not only an emerging market play," he says, adding that ULCPCs will likely become the third or fourth PC for some users.

He says Microsoft is evaluating what Linux on the desktop can do versus what XP can do. "We know that we have to innovate, but certainly we believe there is a big difference here: the elegance, the application compatibility, the familiarity," he says.

Turner says Microsoft is still evaluating which type of hardware will eventually be the most popular.

While those preferences will evolve over time, Microsoft is making sure it has an operating system option in the market. Two weeks ago, the company said it would make Windows XP Home available to OEMs for ULCPCs until 2010.

Microsoft was forced to default to XP given the fact that Vista is too resource intensive for the ULCPC platform.

Last week, Turner traveled to India to finalize a deal with India's HCL to have Windows XP Home as the foundation for "the world's cheapest Windows laptop."

The market for these low-cost machines is being driven by inexpensive bandwidth; the growth of services and cloud computing; and cloud-based processing, storage, management and associated IT services.

Experts have said that the big question is how big the market will become for low-cost computing devices. ULCPCs are drawing interest from governments, schools, emerging markets and developing countries. Microsoft is fighting against emerging interests in using Linux over Windows to keep development costs down.

The market has seen the recent introduction by Everex of its $400 Linux-based CloudBook.

Some manufacturers are hedging their bets. For example, AsusTek sells four versions of its "barebones" Eee PC with a Linux-based operating system, but lists in the computer's spec sheet that they all are Windows XP compatible.

Bruce Guptill managing director of research firm Saugatuck Technology says manufacturers, including major ones such as HP and Dell, are seeing the opportunity in low-cost, Linux-based devices that do everything the average user needs for a price that is between $200 and $500. It's a market Microsoft does not dominate.

In fact, Guptill says the market trend caught Microsoft unaware during its five-year development of Vista.

"The long-standing user computing model of ever-increasing power and speed at the desktop [or laptop] may be fading in favor of lower-cost machines with "good enough" capabilities," he says.

From : http://www.nytimes.com/

Microsoft Reveals a Web-Based Software System

Microsoft is preparing to take its most ambitious step yet in transforming its personal computer business into one tied more closely to software running in remote data centers.

The software giant announced on Tuesday a data storage and Web software system, called Live Mesh, that is intended to blur the distinction between software running on the Windows operating system and an elaborate array of services that will be delivered to a growing collection of electronic gadgets. Live Mesh is Microsoft’s late entry into a rapidly growing market described as cloud computing. The term refers to the movement of software applications and services from PCs to centralized data centers, where they are made available via the Internet. Companies like Amazon.com, Google, Salesforce and dozens of others are building computing centers that will effectively outsource data processing and make it a commodity that companies purchase as they would electricity.

The introduction of Live Mesh is a significant strategic shift for Microsoft, whose operating system helped popularize personal computers. Bill Gates, the company’s co-founder, chairman and chief architect, said in an interview on CNN a year ago, “We’re making the PC the place where it all comes together.”

However, a strategy document circulated to company employees on Tuesday that was written by Ray Ozzie, one of the Microsoft’s two chief technology officers, countered that view.

“The Web is the hub of our social mesh and our device mesh,” he wrote. That statement is the first of a set of three “guiding principles” that Mr. Ozzie outlined in the five-page document entitled “Services Strategy Update.” In taking the PC off center stage, Microsoft is refocusing some of its resources to catch its cloud computing rivals.

“This is a pretty significant public statement that the battle is really a cloud battle,” said Mark Stahlman, a research vice president at Gartner, an industry consulting group. “It’s not an ad search battle or a desktop operating system battle. Those are fought and won already. This is the one that’s wide open.”

Marc Benioff, chief executive of Salesforce, a company that began by offering software that managed customer relations through a Web browser, said Microsoft’s entry “means that the Internet is the center of the world.” Salesforce has more recently begun broadening its product line to a wide range of computing services, also available through a browser. “Consumer services have shown us the way to the next generation of computing,” Mr. Benioff said.

Microsoft refers to its strategy as “software plus services.” However, the new vision is built on Web-based software that will help deliver entertainment as well as business software to devices like Microsoft’s Xbox game console, to Zune music player, to cellphones running Windows Mobile software, even to Apple’s Mac computers and other consumer devices in the home.

The company now believes that no single device will dominate the Web-oriented consumer electronic world of the future. Underscoring that belief, Live Mesh’s logo is a Tolkienesque graphical ring intended to give the user a visual sense that all the devices are interconnected.

Displayed within a Web browser, the Live Desktop page will not be so much a Web-based operating system, said Jeff Hansen, general manager of Microsoft’s Live Services group, but a control mechanism that blurs the location of documents ranging from MP3 and video files to spreadsheets and text documents.

“We’re adopting a wider and wider diversity of increasingly powerful devices,” Mr. Hansen said.

The Live Mesh system, however, is viewed by the company as a software platform in the data center for an evolving array of services, ranging from remote control of computers and electronic devices to data storage. Microsoft also hopes that software and service developers will create applications based on the service.

In the plan outlined by Mr. Ozzie, he refers to the power of choice for customers and acknowledges that software development will be based on “small pieces loosely coupled.” Both of those concepts echo industry buzzwords in the open-source Web development community that has grown outside of Microsoft during the last half decade.

In a telephone interview this week, Mr. Hansen said that the current version of Live Mesh was a “technology preview” that would be available only to a group of about 10,000 test users and software developers. “We want to engage the Web community and software developers,” he said.

On Tuesday evening Microsoft described 15 components of the new Live Mesh service, including a notification feature, a news feature and an information window displayed by the service, but only two user-oriented applications. One synchronizes files on multiple computers. The other, Live Mesh Remote Desktop, is a free software service that will permit users to control computers and other devices over the Internet.

Mr. Hansen, who has been using Live Mesh in a private Microsoft test, said he was able to surprise his wife using the Live Mesh Remote Desktop. From work, he was able to start a song playing on his Xbox at home.

Microsoft said it would begin a public test later this year. The basic service, which will be available initially on devices running Windows XP and Mobile, will later support Mac computers and other mobile devices. Five gigabytes of free data storage will be included, but the company declined to speculate about charges for additional features and services.

Form : http://www.nytimes.com/

Technorati Tags: , ,

Intel Denies Quad-Core Price Cuts Aimed At AMD

slashed prices for older 65nm processors by as much as 50 percent Monday, but the moves have nothing to do with rival Advanced Micro Devices (NYSE:AMD)' new quad-core and triple-core parts and everything to do with the chip giant's ramp of its 45nm line of products, Intel's Todd Garrigues said Tuesday.

But Intel, by slashing in half the prices for Intel's Core 2 Quad 6700 desktop processors and Quad-Core Xeon 3230 server chips from $566 to $266 for 1,000-unit trays, has tongues wagging about the direct implications for struggling AMD.

"If this isn't the final nail in the coffin, it's the tapping of the shovel on AMD's grave," said system builder John Kistler, owner of St. Louis-based J&B Technologies.

"By the third quarter, they're going to be getting everybody to move off the Core 2 Duo. So if you want that, they're going to say, 'It's for mobile. For desktop, we're moving you to quad.' It's Intel's goal to just absolutely put the pedal to the metal and just floor it."

Garrigues, however, downplayed any consideration of the competition in the Santa Clara, Calif.-based chip giant's pricing moves.

"The first thing in my mind is that this is about the 45nm process rolling out. We're really ramping across the whole lineup with 45nm parts," said Garrigues, Intel's North American channel manager for products.

A number of Monday's price cuts of 20 percent or less do seem to simply reflect Intel's 'laddering' of new products to fill price points vacated by older devices, as Kistler put it.

"I'll buy to some extent that [Intel is] trying to push all their 65nm product out of the channel and ramp 45nm. With their tick-tock strategy they're on overdrive. They're never going to slow down again," he said.

An AMD spokesperson called the bulk of Intel's price cuts part of the natural product cycle for both chip makers. But she characterized the more dramatic price drops as directly related to AMD's ramping of its quad-core Phenom and Opteron lines, as well as its unique triple-core Phenom desktop processors. Besides cutting the prices of the Core 2 Q6700 and Xeon 3230 chips in half, Intel slashed prices on its Core 2 Duo E6850 from $266 to $133, or 31 percent, and its Dual-Core Xeon 3085 from $266 to $188, or 29 percent.

Garrigues, for his part, insisted that even the biggest price cuts were nothing more than "a reaction to the price that exists on 45nm."

Form : http://www.crn.com/

Technorati Tags: , ,

AMD quad-core and Parallels Server Beta3

AMD is certainly doing their part to help push virtualization technology. The company just recently released to market their quad-core AMD Opteron processors which give machines an added boost in CPU power. And Parallels is pushing forward with their long awaited Parallels Server product which has now reached Beta 3 stage. They've enhanced stability and performance, and also added a few new features.

Form : www.InfoWorld.com
Technorati Tags: ,