Sunday, September 21, 2008

Guitar Hero Still Rules, Activision Claims

Rock Band might be the critically darling at the moment, but
most gamers still flock to Guitar Hero, says Activision CEO Bobby
Kotick.


Speaking at an investor conference last week as
reported by Kotaku, Kotick said: "We're outselling [Rock Band] 6:1.
When you think about the access we have to 30 percent of the world's
music at Universal, we have a unique advantage."


Guitar Hero,
often considered the original gangster of North American music games,
first launched in 2005 for PlayStation 2, enjoying instant success. Two
years later, MTV Games upped the ante when releasing Rock Band, replete with toy drums and a microphone in addition to guitar and bass.


"Our
nearest comthe petitor [EA/MTV Games] has a couple hundred people
working on these projects," added Kotick. "We have close to 2000 people
just dedicated to the Guitar Hero note tracking, introduction of new
hardware, and introduction of new software, so we just have a lot more
in the way of resources available to us to continue to dominate the
category."


This holiday, the rhythm wars will continue when Activision releases its response to Rock Band in the form of Guitar Hero World Tour, which features a song creation mode in addition to improved drums and instruments when compared to Rock Band. Rock Band 2 launched Sunday for Xbox 360, and will follow in the coming months on Wii, PS3, and PS2.

From : http://www.pcworld.com/

Cell phones in pockets can lead to infertility


New York (PTI): An Indian American
fertility expert has warned men that keeping their cell phones in
pockets and belts while talking on hands-free could affect their
fertility.


In a study published September 19 in
the online version of Journal of Fertility and Sterility, Ashok
Agarwal, lead author, says men who keep their cell phones in their
pockets or clip them to their belts while using an ear piece to chat
may be compromising their sperms.


In an interview with Newsweek news
magazine, he rejected the suggestion that the researchers have debunked
the idea that use of cell phones leads to impotence.


"That's not true. We still have
questions that haven't been answered. And there are still more
questions to ask," he said, adding that his study was designed to
examine whether exposure to radio-frequency electromagnetic waves from
cell phones would cause any kind of changes in human sperm.


An earlier study conducted on some 361
men, he said, had found a significant relationship between cell-phone
use and sperm quality, especially among men who used mobiles for more
than four hours per day. "We wanted to find out what was going on," he
added.


The researchers, he said, took sperm
samples from 23 healthy men, and from nine men with known fertility
issues. The samples were then divided into two portions to make a
control group and a test group.


"We exposed the test group sperm to a
cell phone in "talk" mode with a radiation of 850 megahertz, the
frequency most often used by cell phones in the US."


"We exposed the sperm for about one
hour to see if there was any effect on the sperm quality in exposed and
unexposed portions," he told Newsweek.


The researchers, he said, looked at several markers, including mobility, viability and cellular or molecular changes.


"There were 85 percent more free
radicals generated by the exposed sperm samples in both healthy and
infertile specimens versus the control group, and a 6 percent decrease
in antioxidants in the exposed samples, the chemicals that fight
free-radical damage", he said.


"Motility, or what proportion of sperm
are moving, decreased by 7 percent, and the viability, or the
percentage of sperm that is alive decreased by 11 percent.


"That was for both groups, the healthy
men and men with fertility problems, as compared to a control group
that had no exposure," he added.


Relying to a question, he said, the study is preliminary and the results need to be validated with a larger sample size.


"The next step is to obviously take a
look at the muscles, fat and tissues that separate the testes from this
exposure. We're building a very sophisticated computer model that will
mimic real-time cell-phone use.


Essentially, we want to re-create with
a computer model exactly how men use their cell phones and how it may
affect their fertility," he added.


"Asked where he keeps his cell phone,
Agarwal replied in his pant pocket. But he does not use a hand-free
device. So the phone is a standby mode."


"We're not sure if a cell phone in
standby mode could cause damage to sperm because we don't know for sure
the minimum amount of radiation that may induce damage to sperm cells.
There are a host of things that we don't know at this time, he said.

From : http://www.hindu.com/

Apple Recalls iPhone 3G Power Adapter

Apple is recalling a USB power adapter that shipped with the iPhone 3G because it could potentially be dangerous, the company said Friday.

"Apple has determined that under certain
conditions the new ultra compact Apple USB power adapter's metal prongs
can break off and remain in a power outlet, creating a risk of electric
shock," Apple said in the recall notice.
"We have received reports of detached blades involving a very small
percentage of the adapter sold, but no injuries have been reported."


The affected adapter was shipped with every iPhone 3G in the United States, Japan, Canada, Mexico, and several Latin American countries (a full list can be found here). The adapters sold with the original iPhone or in other countries are not affected, the company said.

Those affected by the recall will be able to exchange their
power adapter for a new, redesigned one. Customers can order a
replacement adapter from Apple's site and receive it three weeks after they order, starting Oct. 10.


For a quicker exchange, users can get the new adapter at an Apple
retail store starting Oct. 10. In-person customers will have to bring
their affected adapter and their iPhone 3G, Apple said.

If you have a power adapter with a green dot on the bottom, you
have the redesigned product already and don't need to exchange the
device.


In the meantime, the company suggests charging the iPhone 3G by plugging it into a computer via a USB cable or with a third-party power adaptor like a car charger.

From : http://www.informationweek.com/


Why the Google-Yahoo Ad Deal Is Something to Fear

Randall Stross at The New York Times goes to bat for the Google/Yahoo search marketing deal,
saying there’s “nothing to fear” from the two companies linking their
search products. I believe most of his analysis is wrong, and he also
skips the publisher side of the market entirely. In short, I feel that
he is exactly wrong in both his approach and his conclusions.

He begins with “GOOGLE controls about 70 percent of the search
advertising market. Doesn’t that give it a monopolist’s ability to set
prices as high as it wishes?”


Well no actually, a monopoly controls only the supply side of a
transaction, so it can’t change whatever it wants. If prices go too
high, users stop buying (this is known as demand elasticity). Being a
monopoly just gives you the ability to charge much higher prices than
you otherwise would be able to because you don’t have a competitor who
can undercut you for less profit.


But Stross skips that analysis and jumps into the meat of his
argument. Ad rates are set by auctions, not dictated by Google, he
says, so Google has no control over the pricing of those ads. If ad
rates go up, it is just the market doing its thing.


This is the focus of his article - saying that there may not be any
ad rate increases (which is absurd on its face), and alternately saying
that if the rates increase it is simply the market responding to more
robust ad auctions.


At the end of the day, advertisers will pay only what they want to
get the ads they need. Most advertisers closely track ad performance to
return on investment. If bids go up, they step back.


The real long term win for the networks is to build a commercial
relationship directly with advertisers. Google has far more of them,
because they’re chasing the massive search page views that Google
supplies them. The more advertisers bidding, the higher the price.


With the addition of Yahoo search queries, there will be even more
inventory, and even more incentive for those advertisers to jump on the
Google platform.


So one centralized marketplace equals the highest economic rent to Google, which they can then share with third parties.


And that’s the big piece of the puzzle that Stross ignored. In May I
wrote about the very real impact that a single search marketing
provider will have on the rest of the companies in the Internet
ecosystem, which tap into those networks for revenue.


On the publisher side things are even worse. Google
doesn’t share enough revenue with content sites that show their ads.
The only thing keeping them even close to honest is the fact that Yahoo
and Microsoft will occasionally compete for those partners. Take that
away, and Google will go back to keeping the majority of advertising
revenue generated at those sites (their only competition will be other
types of advertising, which generate far less revenue). That is a
terrible outcome when you look at it from the perspective of the health
of the Internet.


Microsoft can’t ignore the online advertising market, it’s just too
big and important. And we need to be behind them in this effort,
because if Microsoft and Yahoo lose interest, we’ll be stuck with a
monopoly, and the Internet will suffer. Competition drives innovation.
Competition drives prices down. To wish this away is irresponsible.


Those third party companies (like MySpace, Facebook, Digg, Ask, AOL
and now Yahoo) are at the long term mercy of Google when their first
agreements come up for renegotiation. Google may give Yahoo most of the
revenue today from Google ads, but in ten years when Google is the only
player in town, look for the terms to move towards a more standard
Monopolistic model. Today Google is kept in check via competitive deals
where Microsoft or Yahoo are willing to actually lose money to win away
the partner from Google, and get control of those search queries.

From : http://www.techcrunch.com/

A Gloomy Vista for Microsoft

Last year I was meeting with the CEO of a PC company who offered to
give me a demo of his company's gorgeous new top-of- the-line notebook,
a machine that cost several thousand dollars and came loaded with Windows Vista, the latest version of Microsoft's
operating system. He flipped open the laptop, pressed the power button,
and … nothing. We waited. And waited. It was excruciating. He tried
control-alt-delete. He tried holding down the power button. Finally he
removed the battery and snapped it back into place. The machine started
up—slowly—while the CEO sat there fuming. Speaking in a carefully
measured tone, he acknowledged that he had been less than pleased with
Vista, and confided that he'd visited Microsoft's headquarters in
Redmond, Wash., to express this displeasure in person. I would not have
wanted to be across the table from him at that meeting.


"Nobody
here looks at Vista as a fiasco," says Brad Brooks, a Microsoft
marketing vice president. If that's true, and nobody at Microsoft
thinks Vista has been a public-relations nightmare, then the company is
in trouble. Vista first shipped in January 2007, after several delays,
and immediately had problems. It was sluggish. It had trouble going to
sleep and waking up. It wouldn't work with some printers and
accessories. Users launched a massive online petition begging Microsoft
not to discontinue its old operating system, XP, which is stable, fast
and, after six years of patches, pretty reliable. Many consumers like
me, who'd bought new PCs loaded with Vista, reloaded them with XP.


Microsoft
seems to be getting the message. Working in collaboration with its
PC-maker partners, it says it has ironed out the glitches. It has
embarked on a $300 million advertising blitz aimed at rehabbing Vista's
reputation. But that too has gotten off to a rocky start. Microsoft
teamed Jerry Seinfeld with Bill Gates in ads, and then, after two
weeks, announced there would be no more Seinfeld. Microsoft says this
was the plan all along. More likely, it was reacting to the fact that
the quirky ads made no sense. Also, hiring a TV star from the 1990s
only added to the impression that Microsoft is stuck in a time warp, at
a time when Apple is seen as the king of cool and is gaining market
share.

It's important to point out that the struggle to get Vista on its
feet hasn't hurt Microsoft financially. In fact, Windows revenue grew
13 percent to $17 billion last fiscal year (a record year for
Microsoft), even after the company cut prices on Vista to spur demand.
Microsoft says it has sold more than 180 million copies of Vista, which
is in line with the adoption rate of Windows XP, and Brooks says 89
percent of users surveyed claim to be satisfied or very satisfied. To
drive home that point, Microsoft has launched ads around what it calls
the "Mojave experiment," where it grabs people who hold a low opinion
of Vista and shows them a new operating system called "Mojave." When
the subjects rave about Mojave, Microsoft springs the trick: it's
actually Vista.


Yet the fact that Microsoft has to
run ads like that speaks to the kind of perception problems Vista has
had. Why advertise at all, when almost everyone who buys a PC today
will get Vista on it, whether they like it or not? For one thing, big
corporations—Microsoft's bread and butter—have been slow to migrate
from XP to Vista and need to be convinced that it's now safe to make
the move. It's the same with smaller customers like Mouli Ramani, vice
president of business development at Lilliputian Systems, a tech
company in Wilmington, Mass. He's sticking with XP because he knows it
won't conk out on him. "I'm not willing to risk my career on Vista," he
says.


Meanwhile, Apple's Mac computers, which run
Apple's OS X operating system instead of Windows, have been gaining
share, reaching 11 percent of the U.S. consumer market, according to
researcher NPD. That's a small slice compared with Microsoft, whose software
runs on 90 percent of the world's PCs. But Apple users tend to be the
kind of people marketers refer to as "influencers" or "tech elites,"
the in-the-know folks who adopt the coolest new technology
and set trends. Apple's highly effective "I'm a Mac" ads have done a
great job of positioning Apple as the machine for hipsters, and
Windows-based PCs as the choice for dorks. Remember how AOL used to be
cool, but then became the service used only by people who didn't know
any better? Microsoft is heading down that path. "You fly business
class today, and it's nothing but Macs," says one former Microsoft
executive, who's now carrying a Mac himself, albeit with Vista loaded
on it.


Yet another challenge for Microsoft comes
from PC makers themselves, who are sending mixed messages about Vista.
HP insists it is committed to Vista, but also touts the fact that its
engineers have created little Linux-based software modules so that HP
customers can perform basic tasks, like checking e-mail and playing
DVDs, without booting Vista at all. HP calls this "innovating on top of
Vista," though "sidestepping" might be a more accurate description. At
Lenovo, a team of engineers has been working with Microsoft for the
past year to improve Vista. And Lenovo loads Vista on machines it sells
to customers. For its own use, however, Lenovo still runs Windows XP as
its corporate standard. Make of that what you will.

From : http://www.newsweek.com/

Intel alleges Indian engineer of misppropriation

An Indian engineer named Bishwasmohan Pani was accused of misappropriating confidential information from Intel Corporation. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) filed the charges on Mr.Pani following a raid in his house which reportedly yielded 13 top-secret files with design plans of Intel’s processor chips.

He worked as a designer at the company’s plant in Boston. FBI’s criminal complaint states that Pani declared his decision to resign from Intel in May for joining Advanced Micro Devices(AMD). However, he intimated Intel that he would continue to work at the company till June 11 in order to have access to Intel’s computer network and simultaneously started working for AMD from June 2. He allegedly downloaded the secret files remotely to use them for his personal gains.

However, Bishwamohan Pani refuted the charges by saying that the
design files were not intended for sale. It supposedly was for the help
of his wife who still works with Intel. The case is being tried at US District Court in Boston. Although Mr pani was not put behind the bars, he had to surrender his passport to the US authorities.

From : http://www.newsline365.com/